<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parliamentary Transport Committee urge for all flights to be ATOL protected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.villaseek.com/2009/12/07/parliamentary-transport-committee-urge-for-all-flight-to-be-atol-protected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.villaseek.com/2009/12/07/parliamentary-transport-committee-urge-for-all-flight-to-be-atol-protected/</link>
	<description>With travel news and tips on planning the ideal villa holiday</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Villaseek Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATOL overhaul &#8216;not far enough&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blog.villaseek.com/2009/12/07/parliamentary-transport-committee-urge-for-all-flight-to-be-atol-protected/comment-page-1/#comment-2904</link>
		<dc:creator>Villaseek Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATOL overhaul &#8216;not far enough&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.villaseek.com/?p=286#comment-2904</guid>
		<description>[...] An overhaul of the ATOL passenger protection scheme does not go far enough, according to consumer watchdog Which? Holiday. A &#8216;flight plus&#8217; element is to be suggested in an effort to close the passenger protection loophole when different travel components are booked together with a flight. This leads on from my blog earlier in the week on the Parliamentary Transport Committee suggesting that ATOL protection should cover all flights and not just package holidays, see the full blog here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An overhaul of the ATOL passenger protection scheme does not go far enough, according to consumer watchdog Which? Holiday. A &#8216;flight plus&#8217; element is to be suggested in an effort to close the passenger protection loophole when different travel components are booked together with a flight. This leads on from my blog earlier in the week on the Parliamentary Transport Committee suggesting that ATOL protection should cover all flights and not just package holidays, see the full blog here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

